- 9 - 12 November 2017, Algoliterary Encounter The workgroup Algolit presents a weekend of lectures, workshops and a small exhibition about the narrative perspective of neural networks. Maison du Livre, Brussels.
- 18 November 2016, i-could-have-written-that was part of the art/science conference Digital < dis > Orders organized by the Goethe University Frankfurt Cluster of Excellence Normative Orders & Internet TBD. The workshop was hosted by An Mertens & Manetta Berends.
- 7 July 2016, An i-could-have-written-that workshop + short presentation as part of the Test_Lab graduation edition by V2_ in Rotterdam. link
- 26 June 2016, The first two sessions of the i-could-have-written-that workshop, during the exhibition Fuzzy Logic.
- 17 June 2016, During the graduationshow Fuzzy Logic of the Piet Zwart Institute in Rotterdam, i-could-have-written-that was on view as an installation. link
- 11 June 2016, As a follow-up of the great worksession Cqrrelations in January 2015, Constant hosts a publication launch in which i-could-have-written-that will be shortly presented. link & visit the Cqrrelations publication here!
- 28 May 2016, A first public presentation about the background research of i-could-have-written-that, as part of the section 'A contemporary Delphic Oracle', cur/moderated by Marloes de Valk, during Art Meets Radical Openness in Linz. link & link
Following the title i-could-have-written-that, the workshops offer a
set of writing excercises based on machine learning processes.
(Frankfurt am Main, 11.2016)
Workshop as part of the conference Digital Orders, by An Mertens &
(Rotterdam, Thursday 07.07.2016)
i-could-have-written-that at Test_Lab, the graduation
evening event at V2_, Institute for Unstable Media,
by Manetta Berends
→ documentation of the Test_Lab session
(Rotterdam, Sunday 26.06.2016)
The first two sessions of i-could-have-written-that during Fuzzy
Logic, graduation exhibition of the
Piet Zwart Institute, Master Media
Design, by Manetta Berends
→ documentation of the morning session (11:00 - 13:00)
→ documentation of the afternoon session (14:00 - 16:00)
- "text is a really good interface actually"
- "we need first to acknowledge the fact that both the people who teach machines and the machines themselves are entrapped in a relationship of oppression where both are loosing agency." (...) "To free algorithms and trainers together, both need to engage in a relationship where an iterative dialog is possible and where knowledge can circulate." (...) "How then to reconnect both processes and make machine learning become a dialogical process from the start?" (...) "what kind of machine reflexivity can trigger human reflexivity and vice versa?" (...) "To answer these questions they have only one choice: to engage in a dialog where two reflexivities are teaching each other the contours of their alienation and at the same time how to free themselves from it." link
- "Debiasing Word Embeddings: from she;he::midwife:doctor; sewing:carpentry; registered_nurse:physician; whore:coward; hairdresser:barber; nude:shirtless; boobs:ass; giggling:grinning; nanny:chauffeur to she:he::hen:cock; maid:housekeeper; gals:dudes; daughter:son" link link
- "habitual", "habit is a form of embodied infrastructure/connections" link
- "We don't understand technology, but we also never understood nature, or the body, genes, or cognition" link
- "It is said that to explain is to explain away. This maxim is nowhere so well fulfilled as in the area of computer programming, especially in what is called heuristic programming and artificial intelligence. For in those realms machines are made to behave in wondrous ways, often sufficient to dazzle even the most experienced observer. But once a particular program is unmasked, once its inner workings are explained in language sufficiently plain to induice understanding, its magic crumbles away; it stands revealed as a mere collection of procedures, each quite comprehensible. The observer says to himself 'I could have written that'. With that thought he moves the program in question from the shelf marked 'intelligent' to that reserved for curios, fit to be discussed only with people less enlightened that he." link
- Is it "absolutely impossible to conceive of meaning without order" mister Levi-Strauss? (Myth and Meaning, p4)
- isn't design all about order?
- language - multiple interpretableness = 1 result ??????????????
- "The interesting thing about our time is that however radical the message in your art, if you do your criticism through self-expression, you’re actually feeding the very power structure you’re trying to overthrow. The power structure you’re criticizing also believes in self-expression as the ultimate goal." (...) "Computers can see us as large groups, but they’re glum and only aggregate us to sell us stuff. In reality, the computers give great insight into the power of common identity between groups. No one’s using that. What’s sitting with the computers is a way of seeing new groups, new common identities between people." (Adam Curtis) link